> Would those names have to start with an underscore? Could we reserve the > leading underscore for private properties?
We could, but it seems gross. > What kind syntax do you have in mind? Today it's just a key=value list. > > 1 > name=string,bge0;class=int,1;media=int,4;phyinst=int,1;phymaj=int,162;devname=string,bge0; > Changing file format just for private properties (the use of which we > officially discourage) seems like an overkill. I'm not to worried about changing the file format, but I am worried about limitations due to the file format bubbling up to the end-user interface (e.g., due to roping off possible characters that could otherwise be used in a link property name or value). I'd also like to ensure we keep the parser implementation simple and minimal. -- meem
