> > The interim libdlpi changes don't look quite right to me. In > > particular, i_dlpi_notifyind_process() needs to silently ignore > > properly-formed messages it doesn't understand, rather than passing > > that error onto e.g. the innocent caller issuing the dlpi_recv(). > > I'm not following you. The return value of i_dlpi_notifyind_process() > is ignored by i_dlpi_strgetmsg(). The only thing that matters AFAIK is > that we don't call the user callback for such notifications.
Ah, I missed the part where it's ignored. In that case, it's merely confusing ;-) -- meem
