Cathy Zhou wrote: > I believe the crossbow team has already changed the control messages > (ioctls) to be handled by a non-stream device in their workspace. The new > functions like agetf() would not be needed then. Do we still want to add it?
It seems to me that if the plan for dld is to have a non-STREAMS control device, then we should consider using that approach. On the other hand, if it will add risk to UV, then I'm fine with your implementing agetf() for the "door set" operation for now with the understanding that it may be a short-lived implementation detail. > I found that devfsadm passes the door file name to the kernel, I could see > whether that is an option. But I don't know how to solve the problem to > access the door in the local zone. It wouldn't, since the filesystem namespaces are disjoint between zones. -Seb
