Peter Memishian wrote: > > > I believe the crossbow team has already changed the control messages > > > (ioctls) to be handled by a non-stream device in their workspace. The > new > > > functions like agetf() would not be needed then. Do we still want to add > it? > > > > It seems to me that if the plan for dld is to have a non-STREAMS control > > device, then we should consider using that approach. > > Are they adding that device *only* because of this issue? > I am not sure. But I think the change also helps because we can then cv_wait() in the control path.
- Cathy
