Sowmini.Varadhan at Sun.COM wrote: > On (05/22/07 00:18), Sebastien Roy wrote: >> _________________________________________________________________________ >> | Interfaces Not Removed by This Case | >> |_______________________________|_______________________|_______________| > > Should RTF_SETSRC be in this list? It's used by cgtp, and the > cgtp design doc mentions that the RTF_SETSRC kernel logic "benefits > from the already existing, but hidden command RTA_SRC.."
Thanks for pointing this out. Rather than including RTF_SETSRC as an interface not being removed, I will include RTA_SRC as an interface not being removed because it's also used by CGTP. Thanks! -Seb
