Sowmini.Varadhan at Sun.COM wrote: > On (05/22/07 11:21), Sebastien Roy wrote: >>> Should RTF_SETSRC be in this list? It's used by cgtp, and the >>> cgtp design doc mentions that the RTF_SETSRC kernel logic "benefits >> >from the already existing, but hidden command RTA_SRC.." >> >> Thanks for pointing this out. Rather than including RTF_SETSRC as an >> interface not being removed, I will include RTA_SRC as an interface not >> being removed because it's also used by CGTP. >> >> Thanks! > > There may be some dead code associated with RTA_SRC itself: > see 6542265, for example..
If RTA_SRC is not removed by this case, then the opportunity to fix the bugs in that code will remain after I'm done yanking out Mobile IP. :-) -Seb
