Cathy Zhou wrote: > Peter Memishian wrote: >> > I am thinking to add a function >> > > int mac_open_by_linkid(dladm_linkid_t linkid, mac_handle_t >> *mhp); >> >> A nit, but the idea of having the parameter be a "dladm_linkid_t" feels >> strange. I think of that as a userland datatype; shouldn't there be a >> dls_linkid_t for kernel use? >> > I think we agreed to change name of dladm_linkid_t to be a more general > name (I forgot what it is, Dan is doing that changes now). But I am > thinking that kernel and application share the same type definition. >
Yes we did, the name was changed to datalink_id_t, which so far is only in my workspace. I hope to get it into the UV gate (and into the design document) soon. Dan
