On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 17:08 -0700, Renee Danson Sommerfeld wrote: > I hope this is a reasonable list to send this question to...it > seemed to be the one with the most interest in the dladm user > of the various project lists I considered. > > In the NWAM code review, we received one comment asking why the > dladm, netadm, and netcfg users are not roles (which as best I > can tell simply prevents anyone from logging in as that user). > The netadm and netcfg users are new ones introduced in nwam phase > 1; I can't think of any reason why we can't or shouldn't make > them roles. But before changing the dladm user, I wanted to ask > a broader audience. Any objections to making the dladm user a > role? Any reason why we wouldn't want to do that?
I don't have one, that seems perfectly reasonable. -Seb
