On (09/01/09 19:41), Sebastien Roy wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 16:08 -0700, Peter Memishian wrote: > > > dladm create-iptun -T <type> -l <local-addr> -r <remote-addr> <linkname> > > > > Hmm, so would become the only create-* subcommand that creates a link for > > which '-l' does not refer to the link the object is created over :-/ > > That would be a trade-off, yes. It doesn't feel like a big one to me > given that we'll never need a "over this link" option for create-iptun, > and then have to chose something other than -l to implement it (akin to > show-linkprop's "-c" for parseable).
how about using -a <laddr>,<daddr> itself? Given that iptun *must* have both addresses, is it better to require them to be provided as a comma-separated pair? --Sowmini
