> > Yes. I'm fine with `-a <addr>[,<addr>]' (I think I suggested it a while > > back), but I think Seb doesn't care for it much, and it seems some feel > > confused by the order of the addresses (though I find it natural that the : > I don't care for it indeed. The dladm syntax (and the ifconfig syntax : > independently. For example, one has the flexibility do the following as > distinct steps: > > dladm create-iptun -T ipv4 tun0 > dladm modify-iptun -s <src> tun0 > dladm modify-iptun -d <dst> tun0
I see. I'm ok with -l, -d as well, but another option is to follow the getsubopt(3C) model of -a local=<addr>[,remote=<addr>]. --Sowmini
