Robert, Thanks! In the ACR you can see the session ID as 192.168.1.109;1460692734;1388 and then I send the ACA back with the same session ID.
CW will in about a minute later send me another session ID this time ending in 1389, then 1390 etc. I believe the number after the ';' is indicating a retransmission of a prior ACR. This keeps on going for days with that number being incremented every minute. This telling me that CW is not liking my ACA. Once it gets an ACA back that makes it happy it will stop sending ACRs on that specific session. I can send you a longer PCAP if you want showing the dialogue but either there is a bug in CW in terms of processing my ACA or there is a bug in my ACA format which is causing CW to reject it and send me an incremented ACR. Bud, <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Robert Day (projectclearwater.org) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bud, > > > > I’ve taken a look at the PCAP trace you’ve sent, and this looks quite > normal to me – Ralf sends an Accounting-Request containing billing > information, and the CDF sends an Accounting-Answer to acknowledge it. The > Accounting-Answer just acknowledges the request (so we don’t need to send a > retransmission or fail over, for example) – Ralf doesn’t need to do any > processing on the answer, or answer the answer, or otherwise signal > acceptance in any way. > > > > Could you clarify what you’re expecting to see in this trace that you’re > not seeing, or what you’re seeing that you don’t expect? Also, you mention > that “CW just keeps sending the same session ID of a ACR but the instance > is incremented” – I’m not quite sure what you mean by this, and your PCAP > trace only shows one ACR and one ACA (nothing is being resent). > > > > Best, > > Rob > > > > > > *From:* Clearwater [mailto:[email protected]] > *On Behalf Of *Bud Asterisk > *Sent:* 15 April 2016 17:08 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Project Clearwater] CTF Rf interface > > > > Folks, > > One quick question. Attached is a trace from my CDF connected to my CW-AIO > instance on a VM. ACRs are flowing and I am responding with ACA but for > some reason CW does not like them. I am getting no error logs of substance > from Ralf. Wireshark is not showing my ACA badly formatted. My CDF works > with other vendors IMS components. But CW just keeps sending the same > session ID of a ACR but the instance is incremented. I believe the CDF is > responding correctly. Any insights as to why CW is not accepting it? my > format or CW bug? > > > > > > [image: Image removed by sender.] > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > > Virus-free. www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > > >
_______________________________________________ Clearwater mailing list [email protected] http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
