Hi Bud, I’ve taken a look at the PCAP trace you’ve sent, and this looks quite normal to me – Ralf sends an Accounting-Request containing billing information, and the CDF sends an Accounting-Answer to acknowledge it. The Accounting-Answer just acknowledges the request (so we don’t need to send a retransmission or fail over, for example) – Ralf doesn’t need to do any processing on the answer, or answer the answer, or otherwise signal acceptance in any way.
Could you clarify what you’re expecting to see in this trace that you’re not seeing, or what you’re seeing that you don’t expect? Also, you mention that “CW just keeps sending the same session ID of a ACR but the instance is incremented” – I’m not quite sure what you mean by this, and your PCAP trace only shows one ACR and one ACA (nothing is being resent). Best, Rob From: Clearwater [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bud Asterisk Sent: 15 April 2016 17:08 To: [email protected] Subject: [Project Clearwater] CTF Rf interface Folks, One quick question. Attached is a trace from my CDF connected to my CW-AIO instance on a VM. ACRs are flowing and I am responding with ACA but for some reason CW does not like them. I am getting no error logs of substance from Ralf. Wireshark is not showing my ACA badly formatted. My CDF works with other vendors IMS components. But CW just keeps sending the same session ID of a ACR but the instance is incremented. I believe the CDF is responding correctly. Any insights as to why CW is not accepting it? my format or CW bug? [Image removed by sender.]<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
_______________________________________________ Clearwater mailing list [email protected] http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
