Thanks, I will remove the packages and will validate the deployment again.

Kind Regards,
Junaid

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:25 AM Mark Perryman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> As I have said, I don’t know about the Orange cloudify repo.  However, I
> see no reason why Clearwater packages should need to installed on the DNS
> server.
>
>
>
> Mark.
>
>
>
> *From:* Clearwater <[email protected]> *On
> Behalf Of *Junaid Ali
> *Sent:* 11 December 2018 10:59
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Project Clearwater] Clearwater-management package
> conflicts with bind9
>
>
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for your response and apologies for my late reply. Bind node is
> separate in my cluster but I'm not sure if clearwater packages should also
> be installed on it or not (Orange repo installs some clearwater packages on
> bind node as well).
>
> $ dpkg -l | grep clearwater
>
> ii  clearwater-cluster-manager       1.0-170508.104112
>       all          Cluster manager for Clearwater
>
> ii  clearwater-config-manager        1.0-170508.104112
>       all          Configuration manager for Clearwater
>
> ii  clearwater-diags-monitor           1.0-170504.093807
>         all          Diagnostics monitor and bundler for all Clearwater
> servers
>
> ii  clearwater-etcd                          1.0-170508.104112
>               all          etcd configured for Clearwater
>
> ii  clearwater-infrastructure            1.0-170504.093807
>          amd64        Common infrastructure for all Clearwater servers
>
> ii  clearwater-management            1.0-170508.104112
>       all          Meta-package for installing all Clearwater management
> services
>
> ii  clearwater-monit                         5.18-170403.124108
>           amd64        utility for monitoring and managing daemons or
> similar programs
>
> ii  clearwater-queue-manager        1.0-170508.104112
>     all          Queue manager for Clearwater
>
>
>
> $ dpkg -l | grep bind9
>
> ii  bind9                            1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.18
>      amd64        Internet Domain Name Server
>
> ii  bind9-host                       1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.18
>      amd64        Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X
>
> ii  bind9utils                       1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.18
>      amd64        Utilities for BIND
>
> ii  libbind9-90                      1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.18
>      amd64        BIND9 Shared Library used by BIND
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 4:08 PM Mark Perryman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Junaid,
>
>
>
> I’m afraid I don’t know much about the Orange cloudify repo.  I would
> suggest running bind9 on a separate node to the Clearwater nodes if that is
> possible.
>
>
>
> Sorry not to have a better solution,
>
>
>
> Mark Perryman
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Clearwater <[email protected]> *On
> Behalf Of *Junaid Ali
> *Sent:* 03 December 2018 11:41
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Project Clearwater] Clearwater-management package conflicts
> with bind9
>
>
>
>
> Junaid Ali <[email protected]>
>
> Tue, Nov 20, 11:56 AM (13 days ago)
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.]
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.]
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm Junaid and have deployed Clearwater vIMS using Cloudify (
> https://github.com/Orange-OpenSource/opnfv-cloudify-clearwater).
> Initially, I deployed it using the repo 'repo122' as mentioned at
> https://github.com/Orange-OpenSource/opnfv-cloudify-clearwater/blob/master/docs/clearwater.md,
> Line#53, which worked fine and I was able to make calls and run stress
> test. I have now changed the repo to 'stable' and tried to re-deploy vIMS
> but the installation of Bind node was failing since Cloudify installs
> clearwater-management alongside bind9 package on the Bind node.
>
>
>
> It looks like to me that clearwater packages in 'stable' repo have some
> conflict with 'bind9' package. I have provided more details to a GitHub
> issue (
> https://github.com/Orange-OpenSource/opnfv-cloudify-clearwater/issues/23)
> in Clearwater cloudify repo but the issue appears to be with Clearwater
> packages or bind9.
>
> Does anyone else has faced a similar issue? Any help would be much
> appreciated.
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
> Junaid
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clearwater mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clearwater mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
>
_______________________________________________
Clearwater mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org

Reply via email to