Hi Hasan
> @Reto, do we want to have a dedicated TcProvider or rather define an > ontology for > the mapping of CAS into properties and classes ? > I think we should discuss both alternatives or why to you prefer one over > the other? > I don't see the conflict. How should A TcProvider map the entities without an ontology? An what's the benefit of an ontology without a tool that does the mapping? Cheers, reto > > Kind regards > Hasan > > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Tommaso >> >> Rdfizing the CAS and providing a TcProvider that provides a graph view to >> the UIMA CAS data sounds like a grat plan. I imagine there would be >> interesting stuff that can be done implementing cas consumers on clerezza. >> Do you have ideas for usecases and demo apps? >> >> Cheers, >> Reto >> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Tommaso Teofili >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > recently I've been discussing with Stanbol mates [1] about possible >> usage >> > of >> > text mining algorithms in Stanbol on top of UIMA, so, since they're >> already >> > using Clerezza we agreed that it'd be good to implement a component >> which >> > converts objects from the UIMA CAS model to a Clerezza Graph. >> > Since I am familiar with both I'd volunteer to implement such a thing >> > inside >> > the uima module. >> > What do you think? >> > Regards, >> > Tommaso >> > >> > [1] : >> > >> > >> http://markmail.org/thread/2sstx2girbiydath#query:+page:1+mid:wbky7miem5ggdsi2+state:results >> > >> > >
