Ok guys I will start working on this component as soon as I can :) Cheers, Tommaso
2011/4/6 Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <[email protected]> > I was assuming the CAS data would is already stored by UIMA. I wasn't > proposing to add any new storage. As it's happening now, when you use the > UIMAResourceTagger or UIMABaseMetadataGenerator data will be added to a > persistent an UIMA-Independent MGraph. > > Cheers, > Reto > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Reto, all > > > > If I understand correcly, this means that the resulting metadata obtained > > from the annotation service will not be stored in a triple store, but > > directly on the filesystem (in which format?). The "zz-way" to access > these > > metadata is through this special TcProvider. Right? I think I can agree > with > > this. Does anybody see any problem with this approach? > > > > Hasan > > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Reto, > >>> > >>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Hasan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> @Reto, do we want to have a dedicated TcProvider or rather define an > >>>>> ontology for > >>>>> the mapping of CAS into properties and classes ? > >>>>> I think we should discuss both alternatives or why to you prefer one > >>>>> over the other? > >>>>> > >>>> I don't see the conflict. How should A TcProvider map the entities > >>>> without an ontology? An what's the benefit of an ontology without a > tool > >>>> that does the mapping? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Probably, I misunderstand you. I thought you would like to have a > special > >>> TcProvider that does this mapping instead of using any TcProvider we > have. > >>> > >> Yes, I'd rather have a special TcProvider gibing a life access to the > CAS > >> data rather than copying this data to the MGraph provided by a storing > >> provider. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Reto > >> > >>> > >>> cheers > >>> hasan > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> reto > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Kind regards > >>>>> Hasan > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Tommaso > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Rdfizing the CAS and providing a TcProvider that provides a graph > view > >>>>>> to > >>>>>> the UIMA CAS data sounds like a grat plan. I imagine there would be > >>>>>> interesting stuff that can be done implementing cas consumers on > >>>>>> clerezza. > >>>>>> Do you have ideas for usecases and demo apps? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Reto > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Tommaso Teofili > >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hi all, > >>>>>> > recently I've been discussing with Stanbol mates [1] about > possible > >>>>>> usage > >>>>>> > of > >>>>>> > text mining algorithms in Stanbol on top of UIMA, so, since > they're > >>>>>> already > >>>>>> > using Clerezza we agreed that it'd be good to implement a > component > >>>>>> which > >>>>>> > converts objects from the UIMA CAS model to a Clerezza Graph. > >>>>>> > Since I am familiar with both I'd volunteer to implement such a > >>>>>> thing > >>>>>> > inside > >>>>>> > the uima module. > >>>>>> > What do you think? > >>>>>> > Regards, > >>>>>> > Tommaso > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > [1] : > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > http://markmail.org/thread/2sstx2girbiydath#query:+page:1+mid:wbky7miem5ggdsi2+state:results > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > >
