On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:56 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>                (g.bnode ∈ EARL.Assertion
>                        ⟠ EARL.test ⟶ TEST.webidAuthentication
>                        ⟠ EARL.result ⟶ (g.bnode ∈ EARL.TestResult
>                                                ⟠ DC.description ⟶
> {"found " + principals.size + " valid principals"}
>                                                ⟠ EARL.outcome ⟶ {if
> (principals.size > 0) EARL.passed else EARL.failed}
> -                                               ⟠ EARL.pointer ⟶*
> principals.map(p => new UriRef(p.getName))
> +                                               ⟠ EARL.pointer ⟶*
> principals.map(p => p.webId)
>                                                )
>                        ⟠ EARL.subject ⟶* x509claimRefs.map(p => p._1)
>
>
very hard to read,  should we limit ourself to a subset of unicode, or
should parts of the infrastructure we use (it seems to be the mailing list,
on the web I see more of the characters), or the mailing list be improved,
or both?

Reto

Reply via email to