On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:24:33AM -0700, go moko wrote: > --- Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, applying the patch to bash in the > > temporary system > > will NOT reliably fix this failure. > > > > I still think it's probably bash-related, but I > > have no way of > > proving that, nor of fixing it. > > Ken, > > I've done some more tests, and I can confirm that it's > a bash problem. But I can't point exactly what. > However, as I looked in bash's source code, I saw that > all the parsing is related to bison. However, bash can > be installed without bison, as it's done in chapter 6. > But I suspect it could be the problem, and that bison > should be installed before bash in 6.6. Unfortunately, > I have no machine to test it from the beginning, so > it's only hypothesis. > What do you think about this? > > G. Moko > It sounds plausible. My ppc64, which has a partition reserved for booting, is an hour or two away from me being able to sign-off that my fix to e2fsprogs for the temp system is ok (or not).
If that works, I can start again. Thanks for looking at this. Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce _______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
