On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 12:47:01PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:24:33AM -0700, go moko wrote:
> > However, as I looked in bash's source code, I saw that
> > all the parsing is related to bison. However, bash can
> > be installed without bison, as it's done in chapter 6.
> > But I suspect it could be the problem, and that bison
> > should be installed before bash in 6.6.
 My logs for bash in chapter 6 show that it does find bison (on the
host, obviously - we are cross-compiling, so only tools in
/cross-tools or on the host's system can be used).   This seems to
be a compile-time dependency, there are no references to bison or
yacc in 'strings /bin/bash' on a finished system.

 To be honest, bison and yacc give me a headache even trying to work
out what they do.  I'm still thinking about the c++-type-check
failures.

Ken
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev

Reply via email to