On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 01:51:03PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I also did forget to mention that instead of inetutils I used netkit- > base, netkit-telnet, and netkit-ftp. ftp and ping work like they > should, too. All netkit-base requires is the gcc4 patch, netkit- > telnet requires headers of stdlib and string to be added to a few > source files, and netkit ftp proved to have no problems. > > I'm exhausted on finding the issues in glibc and inetutils ping at > this time. I'm sticking with netkit on my sparc > builds, for now. I haven't heard back from the maintainer of > inetutils, and not sure what could have changed > between glibc 2.4 (inetutils ping last worked with) and later releases > of glibc. > > Looks like 2.6.25.7 kernel has everything working again using the old > config from 2.6.23.1. Now to test the 2.6.24.7 kernel with the > 2.6.23.1 config and see if it works okay. If not, heh.... Someone give > me a hammer! > > -William Interesting results. I haven't checked the detail of your glibc against what I logged for ppc64 in the "clfs-1.1.0" ticket, but some of it certainly had a familiar feel to it.
I've just uploaded my pure64 and powerpc64 patches for 4.2.4 (pure64 had rejections, as did powerpc64 - the new pure64 works on x86_64-64, I haven't had time to start testing ppc64 (multilib) yet). Fingers crossed for your 2.6.24.7. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce _______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
