On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Martin Ward wrote:
I wouldn't mind creating a sysvinit branch and removing the systemd
branch.
surely the other wahy round
note that newer versions of util linux and procps ng include most of
the tools sysvinit provide
The book will be using procps-ng.
systemd provides init related files -> reboot, init, poweroff,
shutdown, halt, etc
util-linux provides mesg, last and maybe one more
procps-ng provides pidof
This leaves fstab-decode and bootlogd for whatever use they are.
I also, wouldn't mind maintaining a book for sysvinit and systemd.
hmm
I also realize that once we implement the simp branch into the main
book, we could effectively have one branch and if sysvinit build
the sysvinit book, if systemd, build the systemd book. It's a ways
to go, but what is the community input about systemd as the main
book?
what's the simp branch?
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/pipermail/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org/2010-May/000795.html
There is also a trac ticket.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
Clfs-dev@lists.cross-lfs.org
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
