On 06/01/14 19:02, William Harrington wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Martin Ward wrote:
I wouldn't mind creating a sysvinit branch and removing the systemd
branch.
surely the other wahy round
note that newer versions of util linux and procps ng include most of
the tools sysvinit provide
yep
The book will be using procps-ng.
systemd provides init related files -> reboot, init, poweroff,
shutdown, halt, etc
yep
util-linux provides mesg, last and maybe one more
procps-ng provides pidof
This leaves fstab-decode and bootlogd for whatever use they are.
I also, wouldn't mind maintaining a book for sysvinit and systemd.
hmm
I also realize that once we implement the simp branch into the main
book, we could effectively have one branch and if sysvinit build the
sysvinit book, if systemd, build the systemd book. It's a ways to
go, but what is the community input about systemd as the main book?
what's the simp branch?
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/pipermail/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org/2010-May/000795.html
thanks
There is also a trac ticket.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
Was going to post how i did, are you proposing to cross-compile systemd
and it's dependencies?
martin
martin
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
Clfs-dev@lists.cross-lfs.org
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
