On 31/01/15 21:44, William Harrington wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 10:51:55 +0000
Martin Ward <[email protected]> wrote:
On 31/01/15 04:45, William Harrington wrote:
Hello,
We have had some domain issues, which won't be resolved. You'd expect if
someone sent an invoice from the same company to reveal something went awry.
Well, we are clfs.org now, unless a miracle occurs.
Who all is still with CLFS? Let us know.
I have notes for our tickets at trac.clfs.org.
I don't have much time to update CLFS as the world is out of whack and going
into convulsions, but I do have notes for my last pure64 bit build with
binutils 2.25, glibc-2.20, and gcc-4.9.2 with branch updates. We need a
multilib patch for gcc 4.9.2.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
Hi
Yes that combination works well, so you mean a specs patch for gcc.4.9.x ?
Martin
gcc-4.8.3-specs-1.patch Yes, for 4.9.2. I may look at it later and see what
all needs to change. I think the main differences from 4.8.3 to 4.9 for specs
is additional targets and they changed the layout of gcc configs if I recall. I
have the specs for pure64 and 4.9.2. Both the 32bit book and multilib share the
same specs patch if I'm correct, too.
Sincerely,
William
.
the 4.9.0 patch i submitted should be good for multi-lib as well on most
common architectures at least
Martin
_______________________________________________
Clfs-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.clfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-support-clfs.org
