On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 23:47:49 GMT, Harshitha Onkar <hon...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> On Windows, the insets obtained for a Non-Resizable AWT Frame was different
> when frame.pack() was called and subsequent call to frame.getInsets() or
> frame.getPreferredSize(). Due to this, the actual and preferred size differed
> when frame.pack() was called for Non-Resizable frame (on Windows).
>
> Earlier the insets returned when frame.getInsets() was called, was that of a
> Resizable frame and not the correct insets associated with Non-Resizable
> frame. Fix is added to native code to get the correct insets. The test -
> AwtFramePackTest.java has been updated to test actual and expected/preferred
> size for both Resizable and Non-Resizable Frames.
>
> The test is generic though the issue and fix is on Windows platform because
> the condition
> `frame.getSize() == frame.getPreferredSize()` should be true all platforms
> when frame.pack() is called.
src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/awt_Window.cpp line 1413:
> 1411: {
> 1412: /* This window hasn't been sized yet -- use system metrics. */
> 1413: jobject target = GetTarget(env);
Moving the declaration and deletion of `target` out of `if` block was on
purpose? Any particular reason related to the issue?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9954
