On Wed, 3 May 2023 11:00:36 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <psadhuk...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> Two CSS AttributeSet-s can be compared using the AttributeSet.isEqual() 
>> method which can fail due to missing implementation of equals method in CSS 
>> subclasses.
>> In this issue, even when two CSS AttributeSet has same 42 font size string 
>> value, Object equality fails.
>> Fixed by implementing the equality and hashCode method for CSS.FontSize 
>> class.
>> 
>> All jtreg/jck tests are ok
>
> Prasanta Sadhukhan has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   More Attrbutes added

Changes requested by aivanov (Reviewer).

src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/text/html/CSS.java line 2539:

> 2537:             return val instanceof CSS.BorderStyle border && 
> style.equals(border.style);
> 2538:         }
> 2539:         // CSS.Values are static, don't archive it.

Suggestion:

        }

        // CSS.Values are static, don't archive it.

A blank line between a method body and a field.

src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/text/html/CSS.java line 2675:

> 2673:             return val instanceof CSS.LengthValue lu && span == lu.span;
> 2674:         }
> 2675:         /** If true, span is a percentage value, and that to determine

Suggestion:

        }

        /** If true, span is a percentage value, and that to determine

A blank line between a method body and a field.

src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/text/html/CSS.java line 2897:

> 2895:         @Override
> 2896:         public int hashCode() {
> 2897:             return Float.hashCode(horizontalPosition);

For better hashing, `verticalPosition` should also be taken into account.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13405#pullrequestreview-1415214777
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13405#discussion_r1186364746
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13405#discussion_r1186365254
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13405#discussion_r1186366897

Reply via email to