On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:54:16 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aiva...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Here we expect events should not triggered.
>>
>> When inconify i expect all events should not triggered , but when form
>> Frame.ICONIFIED to Frame.NORMAL componentMoved and componentResized events
>> are triggered , Events order on Windows and Mac are different.
>>
>> Order of the events for Frame from Frame.ICONIFIED to Frame.NORMAL
>>
>> On Windows
>>
>> Component Shown
>> Frame is Visible with ExtendedState as ICONIFIED
>> Component Moved
>> Component Resized
>> Frame is Visible with ExtendedState as NORMAL
>>
>> On MAC
>> Component Moved
>> Component Resized
>> Component Shown
>> Frame is Visible with ExtendedState as ICONIFIED
>> Frame is Visible with ExtendedState as NORMAL
>
>> when form Frame.ICONIFIED to Frame.NORMAL componentMoved and
>> componentResized events are triggered
>
> Then verify that these events are triggered:
>
>
> - if (componentShown || componentHidden) {
> + if (componentShown || componentHidden || !componentMoved
> + || !componentResized) {
>
> Otherwise it looks as if you forgot to test something. You may have two `if`
> statements to print more precise error message.
We observed different behavior between MS Windows and other OS ,we natively
received WM_SIZE/WM_MOVE events when set frame iconify to
deiconify , The AWT sends the events to components when it receives the events
from the native system.
Now we are applying the OS specific check to test this scenario.
Please check the details at JDK-6754618
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19521#discussion_r1763534174
