> I added description to all the constructors available in `PassFailJFrame`.
> 
> I generated the javadoc for it: [`PassFailJFrame` constructor 
> details](https://cr.openjdk.org/~aivanov/PassFailJFrame/api/PassFailJFrame.html#constructor-detail)
>  which is easier to read. This hosted javadoc could be used as a reference to 
> its API.
> 
> The constructor with the largest number of parameters contains a short 
> description of how to use the `PassFailJFrame` object.
> 
> Shall we deprecate the constructors in favour of `Builder`?
> 
> The builder provides a more streamlined experience, therefore new tests 
> should use it instead of constructors. We may update the tests which use the 
> constructors, after which the constructors can be removed.

Alexey Ivanov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  Use EDT abbreviation in constructor description
  
  The term EDT (Event Dispatch Thread) is introduced in
  the top-level doc comment.

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21145/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21145/files/c36d4076..ff2e7f82

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=21145&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=21145&range=00-01

  Stats: 3 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 1 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21145.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21145/head:pull/21145

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21145

Reply via email to