On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 18:58:14 GMT, Harshitha Onkar <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Post JEP-486 (Permanently Disable the Security Manager) cleanup. 
>> Calls to java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged are obsolete thus 
>> removed in this PR.
>> 
>> This PR addresses removal of AccessController.doPrivileged() calls from 
>> macos-platform files in the java.desktop module.Any SM related imports that 
>> are no longer needed are removed.
>> 
>> This PR is limited to removing doPrivileged() calls and excludes any 
>> refactoring, reformatting, or other clean up that is out-of-scope for this 
>> fix.
>> 
>> PS: I have explicitly add comments to the changes where a more watchful 
>> review is required.
>
> src/java.desktop/macosx/classes/com/apple/laf/AquaMenuBarUI.java line 148:
> 
>> 146:         // Do not allow AWT to set the screen menu bar if it's embedded 
>> in another UI toolkit
>> 147:         if (LWCToolkit.isEmbedded()) return false;
>> 148:         return Boolean.getBoolean(AquaLookAndFeel.sPropertyPrefix + 
>> "useScreenMenuBar");
> 
> Review required

looks OK

> src/java.desktop/macosx/classes/sun/lwawt/macosx/CDragSourceContextPeer.java 
> line 62:
> 
>> 60: 
>> 61:     static {
>> 62:         String propValue = 
>> System.getProperty("apple.awt.dnd.defaultDragImageSize");
> 
> Review required

looks ok

> src/java.desktop/macosx/classes/sun/lwawt/macosx/LWCToolkit.java line 154:
> 
>> 152:         }
>> 153: 
>> 154:         loadLibrary();
> 
> In-depth review required here.

I think what you are doing is fine.

Unrelated, that System.err.flush() seems odd. I've filed a bug to look at it 
afterwards since it has NOTHING to do with the doPrivileged.

> src/java.desktop/macosx/classes/sun/lwawt/macosx/LWCToolkit.java line 173:
> 
>> 171:         System.loadLibrary("awt");
>> 172:         System.loadLibrary("fontmanager");
>> 173:     }
> 
> Refactored System.loadLibrary() calls to a separate static method since they 
> require @SuppressWarnings("restricted") annotation.

I see, because static { .. } doesn't accept an annotation.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22159#discussion_r1844421643
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22159#discussion_r1844426803
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22159#discussion_r1844471546
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22159#discussion_r1844458316

Reply via email to