On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 20:05:13 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aiva...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > I wonder if such a customisation is supported. Synth and Nimbus don't > > > always use the `UIMaganager` to set the defaults. Perhaps, these > > > Look-and-Feels should be excluded from this test. > > > On the other hand, Swing usually allows such customisations and respects > > > settings in `UIManger`… but doing so in Synth and Nimbus often looks > > > inconsistent and requires special handling of UI-delegate classes. > > > > > > I thought about ignoring this property for Synth and probably close "Not an > > issue" but I could not find in spec of not honoring UIManager properties in > > Synth so added this fix...I guess we can argue for both for and against of > > adding this support in Synth but since it's pretty early in jdk25 mainline > > so any problem arising out of this can be tackled before the final release.. > > What I don't like with the current approach is that we'll need to add an > `instanceof` for each component to support customisation. If `UIManager` > properties should be honoured, `SynthContext`, `SynthStyle` or whatever holds > the defaults should look up properties in `UIManager` too. The [`SynthStyle` > class](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/21/docs/api/java.desktop/javax/swing/plaf/synth/SynthStyle.html) > represents “a set of style properties.” It loads the defaults from a synth > file… > > Anyway, it's out of scope for the current fix. If it's a one-off fix for one > component, it's okay to handle it this way. Yet if the number of components > and/or properties grows, we should rethink how Synth-based look-and-feels can > be customised via `UIManager` just like all other L&Fs. It is supposed to be one-off fix so I did via this instanceof check but if more such widgets needs UIManager lookup, then I was thinking of introducing an "else" block to "! instanceof SynthUI" check since I guess most of the widget could be of SynthUI subclass ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22908#issuecomment-2572338695