On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:25:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>As has been pointed out e.g. by Phil, not all libraries are performance
>critical. With that said, maybe such libraries should be
> optimized for size instead? (In many cases that also brings along a speed
> performance, even if it by no means guaranteed.)
Hi Magnus, that sounds like a good idea, especially for libraries that are a
bit larger (if they are below 100K it does probably not make a big difference).
Some candidates that have optimization LOW **and** are larger than 200K
linuxx86_64 macosaarch64
windows-x86_64
BUILD_LIBAWT_XAWT 540K
BUILD_LIBAWT_LWAWT 1.2M
BUILD_LIBZIP 164K
BUILD_LIBSPLASHSCREEN 364K 468K 204K
BUILD_LIBJDWP 330K 312K
228K
BUILD_LIBJAVAACCESSBRIDGE
280K
BUILD_LIBJSVML is also rather large (~ 850K) but has no opt-level set for the
lib make rule; not sure what that means, almost all other libs set a specific
optimization level .
( Besides changing a couple of default opt-levels for some libs, I also would
like to have better configure functionality to set it myself like we have for
libjvm with the 'jvm-features' . )
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23332#issuecomment-2624952613
