On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:37:57 GMT, Harshitha Onkar <hon...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Good news: it looks like it was possible to resolve the `0xFFFF` conflict on >> the HarfBuzz side by adjusting the HarfBuzz internal representation of AAT >> deleted glyphs. Amazingly quick turnaround from @behdad! I think we'll want >> to put this PR on hold until the next HarfBuzz upgrade. How often are >> dependencies like HarfBuzz upgraded? I saw we just completed one today, >> coincidentally. > > @gredler Yes, JDK harfbuzz was just upgraded to v10.4.0 - > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23910. > > @prrace Do we consider patching the fix from upstream for this upgrade or can > it wait till the next time harfbuzz is upgraded - > https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/pull/5119 ? @honkar-jdk Thanks for the info -- note that it's actually a combination of two HB PRs (https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/pull/5119 and https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/pull/5126), and it sounds like they plan to cut a release with the fix later this week. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23665#issuecomment-2711790094
