On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:37:57 GMT, Harshitha Onkar <hon...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Good news: it looks like it was possible to resolve the `0xFFFF` conflict on >> the HarfBuzz side by adjusting the HarfBuzz internal representation of AAT >> deleted glyphs. Amazingly quick turnaround from @behdad! I think we'll want >> to put this PR on hold until the next HarfBuzz upgrade. How often are >> dependencies like HarfBuzz upgraded? I saw we just completed one today, >> coincidentally. > > @gredler Yes, JDK harfbuzz was just upgraded to v10.4.0 - > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23910. > > @prrace Do we consider patching the fix from upstream > (https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/pull/5119) for this upgrade or can it > wait till the next time harfbuzz is upgraded on jdk ? > @honkar-jdk pls remember we need an updated harfbuzz for this PR to proceed. Noted. Thank you for the reminder. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23665#issuecomment-2777107624
