On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:07:04 GMT, Nikita Gubarkov <ngubar...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> `SurfaceManagerFactory` just checks a given `GraphicsConfiguration` against 
>> multiple types via `instanceof`, it has 3 platform-specific implementations, 
>> which rely on an ugly injection process.
>> 
>> There is no reason to have this class at all, we could just let 
>> `GraphicsConfiguration` create a compatible `SurfaceManager` instead.
>> 
>> This would reduce coupling without having to collect all surface manager 
>> types in a single place (without real need to do so).
>> And this would also remove dependency on the class initialization sequence 
>> by getting rid of the injection process.
>
> Nikita Gubarkov has updated the pull request incrementally with three 
> additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - fixup! 8355611: Get rid of SurfaceManagerFactory
>    
>    Remove SurfaceManager.Factory interface from XRGraphicsConfig.
>  - fixup! 8355611: Get rid of SurfaceManagerFactory
>    
>    Split long lines (8339341)
>  - fixup! 8355611: Get rid of SurfaceManagerFactory
>    
>    Split long lines

Marked as reviewed by serb (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24875#pullrequestreview-2796904707

Reply via email to