On Fri, 2 May 2025 18:32:29 GMT, Alisen Chung <ach...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> I've updated the test to include logging and ran the test 200x without 
> failures. I think it's ok to push the test with these changes so that if the 
> test ever does fail again we can use the logs and analyze the problem.

I meant to run the test 200 times with logging but no other changes to find the 
root cause. The other changes to the test seems unnecessary at first glance. 
the test operations are already synchronized and delayed when necessary.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24885#issuecomment-2856471543

Reply via email to