On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 19:23:24 GMT, Phil Race <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> @aivanov-jdk I continue to see failures for tests: >>> java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/JTableInGlassPaneOverlapping.java and >>> java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/OpaqueOverlapping.java. I have resolved conflict >>> by keeping these two tests in problem list. >>> >>> I will fix formatting with a commit. >> >> But that means that although you're resolving this bug it is still used in >> the problem list >> >> java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/JTableInGlassPaneOverlapping.java 8158801,8357360 >> windows-all,linux-all >> >> That line needs to be updated. >> >> 8357360 is about a linux failure. >> Where are you seeing it fail still ? If it is only on Linux you can just >> remove 8158801 from that line (and the windows-all entry) >> Otherwise you'll need to use a different bug ID for windows (a new one >> perhaps) >> >> Ah, I believe I found your test job and it is a Linux-only failure, so that >> line needs to become >> java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/JTableInGlassPaneOverlapping.java 8357360 >> linux-all > >> @prrace I have just tested >> java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/JTableInGlassPaneOverlapping.java on linux, macos >> and windows and it has failed on both linux and Windows. I has passed on >> macos. >> >> I think based on this, it will be safe to keep test >> java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/JTableInGlassPaneOverlapping.java problem listed >> for linux and windows, if this is ok. > > You've missed part of my point. You cannot use a closed/resolved bug in the > problem list, so you must remove 8158801. > At which point what bug will be responsible for the windows problem listing ? @prrace I understand your point now. Basically, the test java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/JTableInGlassPaneOverlapping.java used to pass before the final merge (Which included 3 months of commits on master branch), it looks like some change was made and it has stopped test java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/JTableInGlassPaneOverlapping.java from passing on windows. I will remove, bug 8158801 from problem list. To cover for failures on Windows, I think we can create an new bug , or we can add Windows platform to existing bug JDK-8357360 (Which is linux only currently). Please advise what would be the best way to sort this out. Thanks ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25971#issuecomment-3657594760
