On Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:05:11 GMT, Khalid Boulanouare <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Many Mixing tests failed because the work around click lands on the >> minimizing area in the window control and causes the tests to fail. >> >> This fix changes the width of base frames which allows most of tests to pass. > > Khalid Boulanouare has updated the pull request with a new target base due to > a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes > brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 66 additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into jdk-8158801 > - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into jdk-8158801 > - Removes uncessary import and adds blank lines between import blocks > - Makes inherited method final > - Removes unnecessary URL > - Fixes a typo > - Removes unncessary boolean variable, line and import > - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into jdk-8158801 > - Cleans up code for move visibility > - Cleans up code and adds missed import > - ... and 56 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/bd42f725...59a937ac There's a conflict in `ProblemList.txt`: - java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/JTableInGlassPaneOverlapping.java 8158801 windows-all + java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/JTableInGlassPaneOverlapping.java 8158801,8357360 windows-all,linux-all - java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/OpaqueOverlapping.java 8294264 windows-x64 + java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/OpaqueOverlapping.java 8370584 windows-x64 If the failures of `OpaqueOverlapping.java` is resolved by this change, then both [JDK-8294264](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8294264) and [JDK-8370584](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370584) need to be closed (as duplicate of this one, [JDK-8158801](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8158801)). If `JTableInGlassPaneOverlapping.java` still fails on Linux even with this change, then `JTableInGlassPaneOverlapping.java` needs to stay in the problem list referencing [JDK-8357360](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357360). ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25971#issuecomment-3643342751
