On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Stuart Halloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Based on Rich's elaboration I would be satisified if contains? threw > an exception when called on a vector. >
I understand that it seems less useful for vectors than what you had hoped it meant, but it is still a useful in-range test. What if I were to add sparse vectors? Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
