I vote for "do-with" too. I used to upgrade my Ruby runtime with Ola Bini's Kernel::with. It could be used exactly the same way as proposed do-with. However, do-with is more idiomatic name, IMHO.
RK On 10/21/08, J. McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 21 Okt., 17:24, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I don't see much wrong with "doto->", though "do-with" or "do->" might > >> be okay. I'd probably vote against "do-unto-others-as" > > I would vote for do-with. > > > + 1 > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
