On Oct 26, 1:48 pm, "Matti Jagula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Krukow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am kind of embarrassed to ask this, but is there a "correct way" to
> > do this . Do you simply re-def a function, e.g., to time execution:
>
> def-s are not transactional, so you have to be careful yourself. Also,
> from what I understood, the new def is used only when the function is
> called next time, so if you have functions with infinite or
> long-running loops then you basically cannot re-def them. Or rather
> you can, but it won't be used.
Thanks for you reply. Now, I am still confused but at a higher
level ;-)
Rich, any chance you can give your thoughts about this? Are there best-
practices for thread-safe updating of running programs without down
time?
Thanks,
/krukow
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
