Is there any particular reason for the reversal of the order of arguments between nth and take-nth? I would have expected something like:
clojure/nth ([n coll]) clojure/take-nth ([index coll]) ([index coll not-found]) or else: clojure/nth ([coll n]) clojure/take-nth ([coll index]) ([coll index not-found]) -- Michael Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
