On Nov 25, 12:50 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Nov 25, 12:22 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > This approach might just be too inefficient -- perhaps it would be
> > best to implement the pretty-printer in an imperative style after all.
>
> OTOH it is pretty darn nifty...

...or would be if Google Groups didn't wrap so well...
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to