On Nov 30, 10:00 am, puzzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > subvec is O(1) because it takes advantage of sharing. This is quite > useful. > > Is there a way to write concatvec in an O(1) way, taking advantage of > sharing? > I suspect that the "obvious way" to concatenate vectors, i.e., (into > [] (concat v1 v2)), would be O(n).
There's lazy-cat, if that's an option for you.. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
