Hello, I wanted to know if I was alone thinking that 'mapcat' should better have been named 'catmap' ? When reading code, this looks more natural because it resembles the functional composition of the 2 functions : (cat (map ...))
I know this is an inheritence from older lisp dialects, but clojure has fixed other weird function namings in other areas, do you think this could make sense ? My 0.02 euros, -- Laurent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
