Stuart Sierra wrote: > Very interesting, Christophe. I've been playing with StringTemplate > <http://www.stringtemplate.org/> lately, but this separates design > from code even further. Can it do conditionals, as in "if this > variable is true, includes this HTML element"?
...and the following posts establishing that it can. Therefore, this feels a bit misleading to me: "this separates design from code even further". I just want to point out StringTemplate helps separating design from code, but its main goal is separating the View from Controller and Model in a formally strict way. In the case of enlive, this main goal is not achieved, so it couldn't be done "even further". So my point is we must understand your phrase in a biased way because it appears to be more separated from design, but is less in fact. Disclosure: I have no interest in StringTemplate, other than the fact I read its formal paper today. :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
