Nice :) On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Jason Wolfe <jawo...@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > On Jan 19, 4:29 pm, Jason Wolfe <jawo...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > > I've been doing some OO-type Clojure programming, and have run into > > the following (quite minor) annoyance: > > > > I've defined a struct with a :class of ::Foo in namespace > > my.long.namespace.foo. > > > > In another namespace my.long.namespace.bar, I want to define a > > subclass of this struct. > > In this namespace, I require [...foo :as foo], so that I can refer to > > multimethods like foo/method1. > > > > However, it seems I'm still required to write > > (derive ::Bar :my.long.namespace.foo/Foo) > > when I'd like to write > > (derive ::Bar :foo/Foo) > > On IRC, "duck1123" just showed me that this is already implemented; > you just have to use the "::" form. > > (derive ::Bar ::foo/Foo) > > You learn something new every day... > > -Jason > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
