> sented with the empty set, which doesn't seem right.
>
> For sequences in general, Rich has said there is no such thing as an
> empty seq:
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/966bd0d4bb18a4a2/b56470cbc8b4123e?lnk=raot&fwc=1
>

so the answer is you don't convert the idea over to lists, maybe.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to