On Jan 25, 4:10 pm, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> #- makes sense (CL didn't always make things the wrong way :-)
>
> And indeed, #; *could* break a lot of already existing editors for a while
>
Yes, the issues are:
#; is bad for editors
#- would be incompatible with CL's #-, and couldn't be upgraded to
compatibility without breakage.
I'm not sure the latter is a big deal, as #-test ... in CL is just an
alternative for #+(not test) ...
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
