Additionally, I initially found (some #{:y} [:x :y :z]) to be
confusing. The documentation of "some" (and or, in turn) uses the
phrase "logical true" - I initially assumed this to mean actually
true, but I suppose what it means is "not false or nil".
In that case, it makes me think of the degenerate example (I realize
this is slightly stupid):
(some #{false} (list false))
On Jan 29, 2:48 pm, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is the drawback of the (some #{:y} [:x :y :z]) idiom? Is it too
> verbose? Too slow? Too flexible? Too good a re-use of existing
> functionality? Too helpful in opening ones eyes to the possibilities
> of sets and higher order functions?
> --Chouser
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
