Dare I suggest it <- might be an interesting 'name' for 'pipe' given
that -> calls in prefix and 'pipe' calls in postfix. But I'd rather
not see it contending with Datalog which <- is nice to use.  |  isn't
'official', but it works fine... > and < aren't 'officially' usable in
symbols either so why stop there? :) Overall I prefer Meikel's
suggestion of just having the one macro -> with ? appearing in lists.
For singular functions you wouldn't need to specify the ? so in most
use-cases it would be unchanged, and for multiple arity calls it would
be very explicit and clear what the desired operation was.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to