While it's not the most important issue, I agree with CuppoJava about "Sequence" vs "Seq", while we're talking about names. This pair of terms seems sort of arbitrary, and will probably cause a little semantic pain and confusion to newcomers in the future. Is there a better term than "Sequence" and "Seq" for either of the concepts of "lazy sequence that can be empty" or "sequence that is nil if it's empty"? Overloading the word "sequence" more probably will sometimes get confusing.
On Feb 15, 11:58 am, CuppoJava <patrickli_2...@hotmail.com> wrote: > One thing I did find confusing though was in regards to the doc. > Is there a way to more clearly differentiate between a seq and a > sequence? Up until now, I've always thought of "seq" as just being > shorthand for "sequence" which isn't the case apparently. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
