David Sletten sent me this erratum: << At the beginning of section 2.4 we have "The symbol user/foo refers to a var which is bound to the value 10." Under the next subsection "Bindings" we have "Vars are bound to names, but there are other kinds of bindings as well." The Common Lisp standard defines a binding as "an association between a name and that which the name denotes". This is the second sense used in the book. The first sense of a "binding" between a var and its value is inconsistent. >>
Should I be using two different terms, or is the notion of binding overloaded? Stuart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
